In our fourth installation on the particle も, we will be building upon our existing knowledge of its grammatical functions in new contexts. The difficulty of the content will be significantly harder than before not because the concepts themselves are hard or unfamiliar but because of the detailed nuancing that comes about from the new applications discussed.
Way back in our second lesson on the particle も, we learned how it was an intensifier in both affirmative (positive) and negative sentence structures in the pattern XもYも. We learned at this point how X and Y could be the 連用形 of adjectives or adjectival nouns, but no mention of its use with verbs was made at this time.
Nonetheless, it is also the case that も can be seen used as an intensifier after the 連用形 of verbs. This is especially common in negative sentences in which it most often translates as "even." In the case of しない, it is often then conjugated into ～しないで・せず（に） to then condemn/chastise the listener for what they're doing despite not doing X(, Y, and Z).
Native Verbs (excluding する)
連用形＋も + する/しない
Any する Verb
漢語＋も + する/しない
働く ＋ も + する/しない → 働きも【する・しない】
返事 + も + する/しない→ 返事も【する・しない】
Conjugation Note: One thing to be aware of is that when this grammar is used with non-native vocabulary that requires する to be made into a verb, も should go in between the base word and する/しない in this pattern. This is to prevent redundancy in the use of する because if you were to use the 連用形 of these verbs, that base would end in し because it would come from する, rendering this pattern as "Stem + しもしない."
Don't loiter around if you're not even going to work.
I didn't even think that the result would come to this.
Commenting on legislature without even having read is no more than a foolish act.
You know you can't know whether it tastes bad if you haven't even tried it?
It would seem that there are people out there who will rate (a place) 1-star without even having tried (the place) while (having the nerve to) say they "don't want to go to some restaurant where the chef rates the food without even trying it."
People who make complaints without even verifying (the claim) are the same as those who are rating (places) without having even taken a bite.
Hatanaka-san always tries doing things alone saying, "please let me do it," even though he can't even do it.
Of course, I am not in the position of receiving such high-quality sake like this, so I will neither drink nor purchase it.
Grammar Note: Note that いたす is the humble form of する.
Even if I submit a plan to improve things, management wouldn't ever listen.
I wonder how (they) even know if (they) haven't even looked (at it)?
What would someone possibly say based merely on principles without having even assessed the situation or even been on the urgent scene?
From 光の雨 by 立松和平.
I can't even respond.
Grammar Note: As Ex. 8 demonstrated with する changing to its humble form, there is nothing stopping you from changing it to its other forms. This includes both potential forms: できる and することができる. When も intensifies these structures, its placement is as shown here in Ex. 12. This principle applies to other verbs. Meaning, 連用形＋も＋できる/できない is a possible pattern , but the use of できる in the affirmative is limited to verbs whose 連用形 can function as standalone nouns, and the same can be said for 連用形＋もできない (in the negative), which is also quite rare and limited to literary contexts.
The girl couldn't hide her feelings, nor could she suppress them, ultimately dropping to her knees and crying out as she shook.
I also can't be staying too long.
Grammar Note: 長居する is a native する verb, but what is most noteworthy is how the negative progressive form of する is used. In Ex. 15, も is seen after the 連用形 of ～ていられる rather than the 連用形 of the main verb 寝る as も's placement affects what is being emphasized. In Ex. 12, the act of staying long, 長居, is at the forefront of the speaker's mind, whereas in Ex. 14 the act of failing to keep up the action (sleeping) was a huge deal to the speaker.
Affirmative (positive) contexts are also possible, but there is one additional restraint. The verbs chosen must be able to be used as standalone nouns in the 連用形. This renders the pattern as typical instances of Xも(Yも).
There's just something (about the situation) I can't make sense of despite how I even properly explained (myself) and kept apologizing (for it).
It even does the function of absorbing nitrogen and phosphorus.
It gives off an incredibly harsh impression while also arousing special attention (to it).
People attack because of how they get frightened, and they get attacked because of how they get frightened.
Grammar Note: While we've seen ～もする/しない follow the 連用形 of the potential form (Ex. 15), it may also follow others form such as the passive form (Ex. 20) and the causative form.
The diary is left at my parents' home as I can't even throw it away.
22. 縮みもすれば伸びもするし色落ちもする。 そんな素材なのです。
It shrinks and it stretches out. Even the color fades. It's that kind of material.
Grammar Note: Ex. 20 is a great representation of XもAなら/ばYもB with X and Y being the 連用形 of verbs.
I'm so tired of talk I don't even want to know or hear about.
This pattern simply uses the 連用形 of the adjectival ending ～たい. The negation is still marked after X and Y.
What we're looking for is X (and Y) to contain なく-: the 連用形 of ～ない.
This pattern is most often used with verbs. Its use with the copula, adjectives, and adjectival nouns is seldom. It is usually far more natural to use ～で（は）ないわけではない or something similar with adjectives and adjectival nouns.
I am not "me," but neither am I not "me."
It's not that I can't pay for it, but it's still a little expensive.
(You're) the kind of normal that isn't necessarily not (his/her) type but still also not (his/her) type.
27a. There isn't anything unnatural about it (but it is a little strange).
27b. It's not the case that's unnatural. (Refute)
27c. It's definitely not the case that it's unnatural (but it is imperfect).
27d. No, it's natural.
The particle も can produce emphatic forms of so many grammar points. Another way in which it does this is in between the particle て and supplementary verbs that follow it.
It might be a good idea to taste it once to see what it is.
It's 4 stars, but it's pretty and worth traveling a far ways to go there.
Plus, this place is the best for being able to just sleep and not have to worry about anyone else when you get tired.
What inspired me to jump into the restaurant industry which I wasn't even contemplating while job hunting was my store manager.
He even lets me win as well as lose (when I need it).
Grammar Note: Although diverting somewhat back to も's relationship with the potential form and where it can possibly go in a structure, we saw how も easily fits after the root of する verbs (Exs. 12, 14) , but it can also fit in between ～て and いる (Exs. 16, 33).
I also can't be staying too long.
I can't even be staying long.
～ていられない is used to indicate that one doesn't have the leeway, whether it be a time or emotional restraint, to be in the position of doing said action. も's difference in placement between Ex. 13 and Ex. 32 isn't so significant because 長居 can't provide a 連用形 for it to follow. This is also reflected in how the sentences are translated.
Another placement for も is after the 連用形 of ～ていられる and then following it with しない, which we saw in Ex. 15. Typically, if there is more than one way to emphasize a point, the longer form is more emphatic. This is certainly the case here, but ～ていられもしない to many speakers may sound overblown if the context isn't a big enough deal to support the use of that sort of tone.
I just think that's why you can't even have the leeway to be so optimistic like that.
Fossilized grammar is a great way to learn about fascinating aspects about grammar you already know. This is certainly the case with the particle も. Similarly to how も can find itself before supplementary verbs but following the particle て, it used to also follow supplementary verbs that would simply attach to the main verb. Meaning, も would follow the 連用形 of the main verb and split it from its supplementary verb. However, the phrase would still be viewed as a single unit. In this sense, も functions as what is known as an infix (接中辞): an affix that goes in between two morphemes.
For every example that this occurs with も, the base phrase minus it is also in use with no change in meaning as も's purpose is to intensify its nuance. When も functions as an infix, the phrase itself is obligatorily in the negative form. As the phrases themselves are fossilized relics, older forms of the negative are more appropriate--ぬ (the 連体形) ず (the 連用形 and the 終止形).
The Japanese Army panicked at such a fierce attack on such an unexpected locale by such an unexpectedly fierce squad at such an unexpected time.
Verb Note: Without も, we get the synonymous 思いがけない. This is treated as a set phrase and is not seen in the affirmative.
No, in a way, I was astonished at how this unknown town painter had, upon having gathered knowledge on the Tosa-style painting, created this painting style that Tosa artists generally hadn't imagined.
Verb Note: Although 考え及ぶ does exist, it would typically be replaced with 考え付く in the affirmative.
Also, it is such an unexpected, coincidental incident and an almost unbelievable and outrageous way to die.
Verb Note: 思い設ける in the affirmative means to be mentally prepared ahead of time, but it is hardly ever used in the affirmative as 予期する is far more common.
New Prime Minister Yoshihide Suga (finds himself) unexpectedly at the top of government!
Verb Note: 思い寄る in the affirmative means "to come to mind," but this meaning is usually carried out by 思い当たる. In the negative, with or without も, however, it is fairly common as opposed to some of the other examples we've seen of this fossilized grammar.
Inventing, namely, contributes to the development of mankind.
Verb Note: 取り直す, unlike all the other affirmative verbs mentioned in this section, is a very commonly used verb with several meanings including "to take/obtain again," "to re-grip," "to re-wrestle (in sumo)," "to reconsider one's feelings," and these are just the interpretations when とる is spelled as 取る in Kanji. The meaning of 取りも直さず stems from its meaning of "to reconsider one's feelings," but as it's in the negative, this gets interpreted on the lines of "not (needing) to reconsider = as is = namely = in other words."
If the particle も can find itself after the particle て, both in ～ても and when a supplementary verb follows, it wouldn't be a stretch of the imagination to expect it as an intensifier of conjunctive particles in general, which is indeed the case.
Even though they are aware that the outlook is exceedingly bad, China demonstrated the acknowledge that it is not heading towards a recession.
Grammar Note: ～ながらも is "while" in the contrastive sense. Sometimes, ～ながら can mean this without も present as も serves as an intensifier, which is the case in 残念ながら.
There are also more than just a few companies which cannot depict an actual way forward despite understanding the necessity behind digital transformation.
Grammar Note: ～つつも is mostly synonymous with ～ながらも, but it tends to used with more emotionally based contexts.
(He) continued seeing another women even upon living together and marrying her.
Confusingly, on seldom occasions も should be interpreted as intensifying the use of て in the chronological sense of when/how things occur as opposed to establishing a contrastive condition (逆接条件). When this occurs, the entire verbal phrase must function as a modifier (修飾語) on a nominal phrase. Although it may seem overwhelming to figure out how ても could possibly be interpreted any other way given how pervasive its use of meaning "even if" is, when the following clause is clearly not in contrast but a continuation of the first clause, then seeing it as a nuance intensifier becomes the only logical interpretation.
It would be good for you to think in my shoes a little.
From 伸子 by 宮本百合子.
The particle も also follows the conjunctive particle たり despite how it repeats itself. When paired together, も is placed after the final instance of たり and then followed by する. This essentially means that this a derivative of 連用形＋も＋する/しない.
Grammar Note: Remember that the particle たり can be used with both verbs and adjectives, and they can be used together in the same pattern as is seen in Ex. 46. The point to listing examples with たり is not to necessarily imply that one is going back and forth between the two situations, but that the situation(s) listed are a part of various similar things that are true in that moment.
The film wasn't isn't grotesque (or anything like that), contains little blood, and is one you can fully enjoy.
I didn't even cry (or anything) before your eyes.
My skin didn't particularly get chapped or even red, so I'm planning on using it on the blemishes on my face next!
Couldn't it just be that other people are perhaps even darker than you think?
～ようとする indicates that the subject is "aiming/trying" to do an action on purpose. The particle と in this expression functions as a citation case particle, which means that も functions as an identifier no differently than it would with other case particles. With the case particle と quoting the entire clause before it, though, this means that も is emphasizing the whole clause as well.
While it is true that the negative rendition ～ようともしない is by far the most common, the affirmative rendition ～ようともする is also used. In either situation, も translates as "even."
People who don't even listen to peoples' advice are beyond saving.
I hate myself for not even trying to do anything.
However, it was very disappointing how (he/she) didn't even attempt to answer the questions I had, saying that the sample response (he/she) had on hand was "correct" (and moving on).
Additionally, North Korea is even pushing pressure on candidates in the South Korea presidential race, demanding that they object to American policy regarding sanctions and denuclearization.
(It) even tries eating (its newborn) fries immediately after giving birth (to them).
In the past, the 連体形 of verbs and adjectives could be used as nominal phrases which could then be followed by particles. Some phrases have been modified over time to utilize the modern 連体形 of the verbs/adjectives involved, which is intriguing considering how this is a remnant of older grammar, but this not always the case.
X and Y must always be antonyms and the reason for why XもYも is being used is to identify the paired situations as beyond the point of being argued.
Both young and old were moved.
Grammar Note: 若き is the traditional 連体形 of 若い.
Do you really think this is just about forgiving or not forgiving!?
Grammar Note: ～あるものか strongly rebukes whatever notion another person has just insinuated. If it happens to be directed to oneself, it becomes a very impassioned expression of humility.
There is nothing 'clean' or 'dirty' about money.
Grammar Note: The 連体形 of 綺麗だ is 綺麗な. Although it would not be ungrammatical to use in Ex. 55, "綺麗も汚いもない" functions as a set phrase and sounds far more natural without な.
To distinguish between anything.
Literally: To distinguish between both sour and sweet.
A story which brings tears whether heard or told.
The leaves had wilted due to the long drought and beyond pitiful to look at.
Grammar Point: 見るも may also translate as "patently" or "clearly at first glance" and can be thought of as an adverb in its own right. Although there is no other situation paired with it, it is still an example of も directly attaching itself to the 連体形 of a verb.
The word 同然 is no-adjectival noun (ノ形容動詞) meaning "just like/no different from/(almost) the same as/as good as" which may follow nouns (with or without the use of も) or after the verbs in any form in the 連体形 with the particle も always present right before it. ～（も）同然だ may be used as a predicate as such, but it can also be used as an attribute as ～（も）同然の. This is where 同然's classification as a no-adjectival noun really comes into play. Translating it into natural English may be tricky, but as all the given translations indicate, its purpose in the sentence is to state how something is basically the same as 'that.'
Whenever 同然 directly follows a noun, it is best viewed as a suffix, but as for when も goes in between, も itself functions to emphasize inclusiveness.
It was not suicide but rather no different from being killed by those near (him/her).
I had played the koto several times, but I was as good as a beginner.
Don't you think that hiding someone's stuff is (almost) the same as being a thief?
We've pretty much lost the war.
In other words, our situation is no different from having won.
Putting down the sheep was just like having (his/her) family killed.