Adding the causative and passive forms together creates the 使役受け身形. As the name suggests, the ordering of the endings is causative then passive. Because there is a short causative form, there is a short causative-passive form. So, we will need to look into detail on that. Also, because the causative can either be interpreted as make and let depending on context (remember that natives often do not sense a difference between the two concepts), the causative-passive reflects this as well.
The 受身形 (passive form) and the 使役形 may be put together by attaching ～られる to the 未然形 of the causative auxiliary verbs, which also attach to the 未然形 of the main verb. First, we will look at the combination of ～させる・せる and ～られる. If you are still unfamiliar with the term 未然形, the chart below will show you how to create it and the pattern.
|Class||Verb||動詞||原形 → 未然形 ＋ 使役 → 未然形 ＋ 受身||使役受身形|
|一段||To wear||着る||→ 着＋ させ ＝ 着させる → 着させ ＋ られる||着させられる|
|一段||To close||閉める||→ 閉め ＋ させ ＝ 閉めさせる → 閉めさせ ＋ られる||閉めさせられる|
|五段||To eat (俗語)||食う||→ 食わ ＋ せる ＝ 食わせる → 食わせ ＋ られる||食わせられる|
|五段||To scratch||掻く||→ 掻か ＋ せる ＝ 掻かせる → 掻かせ ＋ られる||掻かせられる|
|五段||To sniff||嗅ぐ||→ 嗅が ＋ せる ＝ 嗅がせる → 嗅がせ ＋ られる||嗅がせられる|
|五段||To pierce/sting||刺す||→ 刺さ ＋ せる ＝ 刺させる → 刺させ ＋ られる||刺させられる|
|五段||To shoot||撃つ||→ 撃た ＋ せる ＝ 撃たせる → 撃たせ ＋ られる||撃たせられる|
|五段||To die||死ぬ||→ 死な ＋ せる ＝ 死なせる → 死なせ ＋ られる||死なせられる|
|五段||To jump||跳ぶ||→ 跳ば ＋ せる ＝ 跳ばせる → 跳ばせ ＋ られる||跳ばせられる|
|五段||To carve||刻む||→ 刻ま ＋ せる ＝ 刻ませる → 刻ませ ＋ られる||刻ませられる|
|五段||To print||刷る||→ 刷ら ＋ せる ＝ 刷らせる → 刷らせ ＋ られる||刷らせられる|
To begin grammar analysis in this lesson, let's consider the particle differences to expect between the passive, causative, and causative-passive conjugations. Take note of the first three very similar example sentences demonstrating this point.
The particle に marks the forcer and the person made to do the action is simply the subject of the sentence. Notice the differences in translation and particle usages in the following.
My pronunciation got corrected by the teacher.
Sentence Note: 先生 is the doer of the correction; the pronunciation is the direct object of what was corrected.
To make a person correct someone else's pronunciation.
Sentence Note: 人 is the person being made; you are the person making the person do so.
I was made to correct the pronunciation of the other students by the teacher.
Sentence Note: The teacher is who forced you to correct the pronunciation of the other students.
Contracting the Causative-Passive Form
Remember the short causative endings ～さす and ～す? For the latter, you can add the ending ～れる to create the short causative-passive. Because these endings are using the 未然形, some students mistakenly think that ～される is somehow the ending, which is not the case. However, using the legitimate short causative-passive form when you should be used the passive form because of confusing this as a longer passive form is most certainly incorrect.
As we know, ～す only attaches to 五段 verbs. The short causative-passive form has another restriction. When a verb ending in す takes ～す, you use the 未然形 さ. Because ～す will also be in its未然形 さ to take ～れる, two さ would be next to each other. So, you cannot say things like 話さされる. Therefore, only 五段 verbs not ending in す can have a short causative-passive form. The chart below illustrates the causative, short causative, causative-passive, and short causative-passive forms for all kinds of verbs.
|上一段||見る||見させる||見さす (△)||見させられる||見さされる X|
|下一段||食べる||食べさせる||食べさす (△)||食べさせられる||食べさされる X|
|サ変||する||させる||さす (△)||させられる||さされる X|
|カ変||来る||来させる||来さす (△)||来させられる||来さされる X|
The final three short causative-passives being wrong is not surprising. After all, two さ is unnatural and is resultant of using this shortcut with the wrong kind of verb. Surprisingly, though, one combination was given a △. This means that 死なされる is not common Japanese and is usually avoided. For instance, say you have 本人の意思で医者の手により死なされた. This is odd considering the antonym 生かされる exists. This is because rephrasing with 死なせる is more common/natural. Thus, 死なされる isn't grammatically faulty but hardly ever used and thus usually unnatural.
～す should only be used with 五段 verbs. However, you often hear things like 食べさして, although this sort of speech sounds dialectical. You could view this as a corruption of 食べさせて or a use of the short ～す in the て形. Thus, △ should actually be X in terms of 標準語.
My brother was made by his mother to clean the room.
The students are made to practice Kanji by the teacher.
I was made to eat all of the cookies by my big brother.
I was made to wait by my girlfriend.
The slaves were made to work for no pay every day.
Since I wasn't forced to eat carrots by my mom when I was a kid, I still hate them.
To be in a craze.
He was expelled from school.
X makes Y get...by Z
In English, we can say the following sentences.
13. 先生はリンゴを学生に食べさせた。 ◎
It appears already that a direct reflection of 4 is impossible. Consider, though, the following which relies on introducing a different word to the equation: 仕向ける.
14. 先生はリンゴを学生に食べさせるように仕向けた。〇 But not ◎
16. 先生はリンゴが学生に食べられるようにした。 X
17. 先生は、リンゴが生徒に食べられるように仕向けた。 X
～られるように仕向ける and ～させるように仕向ける both exist, but the former is incorrect in this context as the speaker is not being affected. This because there is will involved in making something be acted upon. Now, we'll see how ～させるように仕向ける can go from 〇 to △ because of what 仕向ける means and not because of the existence of the phrase.
仕向ける is working up someone to doing something (tempting/inducing) and it's a lot more work than just a simple scene of a witch giving an apple, eat, and then done. Even if the witch was pushy at that moment, the work behind for 仕向ける situations would be a mismatch. With this in mind, consider the following.
18. 魔女は白雪姫に毒リンゴを食べさせるように仕向けた。 （ちょっと変）
Japanese may not allow you to explicitly say what you can in English with "the teacher made the apple get eaten by a student", but you can supplement this semantic information with context. This is what we have to do when languages don't meet eye to eye.
Causative + Potential
It just so happens that ～られる also has the "potential" usage. So, is "the causative-potential" possible? Yes. However, the particles would be clearly different. Sometimes, if the phrase is already getting lengthy for whatever reason ～ことができる may be seen. However, the combination of "the causative" and "the potential" is not problematic. Thus, you should always pay attention to particles as this will get rid of any ambiguity between this and the causative-passive.
I can feed the dog.